[Tig] DI workflow, capabilities and requirements
Sat Mar 26 16:29:57 GMT 2005
Backs from the pub, after a few pints of 'wife beater', so accept any
The calibrated dailies approach is potentially cheaper than the traditional
model as the colourist tends to be the most expensive part. Also, self
calibrating transfer engines will be cheaper than telecines as they require
less functionality. I'm impressed by the Cintel dataMill as the present
likely system of choice, and its book price is a lot less than traditional
telecines. It can also scan film at SD, HD 2K and 4K, all calibrated to
cineon LOG specs. However, you don't need to scan dailies and the final high
resolution on the same system as any transfer devise that works to cineon
specs will be well within acceptable tolerance if calibrated correctly.
Due to costs the present approach is still to scan for dailies/offline at HD
or below, then re-scan for the online at 2K (4K?) using a pull list from the
offline. We are all waiting for speed and storage capacity to allow full 2K
scanning for dailies that can be used for the offline and online, but that's
some time away, although for Silence Becomes You we did obviously capture
all material in full resolution on digital media - 25TB in total, so we are
We work to NAS discs for near realtime/near online storage, with full
realtime discs for the active DI work and LTO2 for archive. There is a full
workflow description on www.digitalpraxis.net.
All the best,
Digital Praxis Ltd
+44 (0)7765 400 908
steve at digitalpraxis.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg D." <gd.tk at comcast.net>
To: "Steve Shaw" <digital.praxis at virgin.net>
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 3:09 PM
Subject: RE: [Tig] DI workflow, capabilities and requirements
> So the "trick" for your "dailies" method is to have hardware that can
> trf/scan and RE-trf/RE-scan w/ perfectly repeatable color yet varying
> resolutions. What hardware do you personally like? How long will it take
> before most "dailies" services can convert from being/using the "cheapest"
> to your model? (In other words, are all the SD only telecines useless -
> even for, or perhaps you'd say especially for, dailies?)
> Also, in your experience with DI, are folks scanning/trfing "all" their
> at the "final" resolution or still following the "traditional" method of
> all-at-low-res and selects-at-final-res?
> Lastly, it seems like folks are interested in what hardware all the
> is transferred to (hard-drive arrays?) and/or archived onto.
> -Greg Dildine
> PS please share your thoughts with the TIG if you wish. Thanks.
More information about the Tig