[Tig] Is FinalTouch any good
Mon Apr 3 22:47:27 BST 2006
Thanks to oktobor for supporting the TIG
For FCP HD - HDCAM SR - FT HD workflow you simply
cannot beat FT HD especially at this pricepoint where
nothing else comes close.
FT HD is pretty buggy, it can get pretty bad sometimes
but at the same time for the price you can do pretty
much anything you can do on a Da Vinci or Lustre.
Depsite the problems few DI houses get work done with
It can require quite a bit of rendering time so you
need to plan and manage your rendering time
Hopefully one day all bugs get worked out, once this
happens FT 2K or HD would become a really cost
effective alternative to Lustre.
--- Jean-Do <jd at escapelab.com> wrote:
> Thanks to oktobor for supporting the TIG
> We are a post-production company mainly working for
> A director would like to edit and grade his movie
> (shoot in HDCAM) in our
> For that, we will need to add Silicon Color's
> FinalTouch HD to our Mac with
> Final Cut HD and Xserve.
> Is it any good? Apart from the fact we can't do 2K
> or 4K (yet), how far is
> it from a very expensive color grading equipment
> like Da Vinci? (Apart the
> fact that it is not real time)
> Is there any specific limitation?
> Does it require a lot of rendering time? Will the
> client be bored waiting
> for his footage to render?
> I try to find a comparative study on the net but
> couldn't find it.
> Thanks for answering my newbie questions,
> Jean-Dominique Vandenberghe
> 4, rue de l'Abattoir, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
> phone : +32 2 213 60 20
> direct : +32 2 213 60 29
> fax : +32 2 213 60 21
> skype ID : thisisjeando
> jd at escapelab.com
> Tig list -
> TIG wiki: http://tig.colorist.org/wiki
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Tig list - http://tig.oktobor.com/mailman/listinfo/tig
TIG wiki: http://tig.colorist.org/wiki
More information about the Tig