[Tig] Curves for serious Color Correction
Craig Leffel
craig at optimus.com
Tue Oct 17 13:14:34 PDT 2006
Steve Hullfish wrote:
>
> I know that most serious colorists I've spoken to have an aversion to
> using Photoshop-like Curves to do tonal or even color cast
> corrections. Obviously many color correction tools don't even have the
> ability to correct with Curves.
> >>Is it a case that practically every colorist in the world has been
> trained on da Vinci and da Vinci doesn't have Photoshop-like Curves,
> therefor they can't be useful? >>
>
Allright. I will admit that I had a temper tantrum about curves a few
years (months?) ago and I sounded like an idiot right here in this
forum.... or at least someone who doesn't appreciate curves the way some
Print or Photoshop artists might.
However, for this discussion, what I will say is that I think curve
manipulation is meant for Subtlety. Finesse. Tweaks. an Umph or an RCH.
Even tonal, or color casts are fine... when you understand what other
limitations you might be causing...NOT a tool to be engaged to do gross
manipulations to the image.... at least not in my space. However, I have
to admit that I'm really talking about Master curves and not channel
curves here. I think introducing a large manipulation into a master
curve is just asking for unpredictable results. You can achieve the same
results other ways. By introducing that kind of manipulation you are
either limiting your other tools drastically, or usually creating a
scenario of unpredictable results... like a knob or button doesn't react
the way you expect it to when you use it. Yes, it IS important that your
tools work the way you think they might... how else could we color
correct drunk all these years? Especially those of us in cow-town, I
mean c'mon, according to some L.A. types, we're barely able to figure
out how to turn on the lights over here, let alone do color
correction......... we need the tools to behave responsibly.
SO, again, using it at the end of the CC process, as a very downstream
tool, for small "bumps" or changes... all fine, and I do it quite often
on a Davinci 2K or a Lustre. I just don't like seeing a young colorist,
editor or graphic artist reach for it as the first approach. It doesn't
make sense. Why, just the other day I was trying to explain "Fettle" to
a few of our Junior Artists. They had sort of "figured out" how to use
it, but had no idea what they were doing, or how to use it with some
amount of predictability. It's one thing to mash buttons, twist knobs,
and see what you get. My seven year old is actually a beautiful
colorist. He gets it. He can spin a Davinci panel until it's a crumpled
heap. Does he understand what he's doing? Obviously not. Did Jackson
Pollack really understand the impact of throwing paint? Maybe not. I'll
take the course of understanding thank you...
Maybe that's why "serious" colorists you've talked to don't think much
of it Steve, but I have no idea what serious colorists you've talked to...
As we all know, I'm serious about being serious. Maybe I'm a serious
colorist.... nah, doubt it.
************** Subject Break **************************
Rob, did you really Ban Steve Shaw? I think that's a little heavy
handed. The guy is doing good work and sharing his experiences. I know
the rules, and I don't think sharing experience is the same as
advertising, even though he runs a business. On that regard, we all run
businesses. Our own client bases. We represent ourselves here. Steve has
always spoken as himself, like it or not... and I have obviously taken
issue with his frequency, attitude, colorist experience, etc... however,
I would like it to be known publicly that I am NOT in favor of censoring
him and banning him from posting. On the contrary, this list needs
people of passion, with strong hearts and minds. Engineering drivel can
only satisfy for so long. My personal vote, and I don't think I really
get one here... is that he be re-instated.
Happy ball twisting folks ... my own personal apologies for my rash of
postings lately. I'm sure some of you are quite sick of it.
Regards -
Craig Leffel
More information about the Tig
mailing list