[Tig] Premature Death of SR
Jeff and Jill Jones
jeff-jones at att.net
Tue Mar 22 23:44:29 GMT 2011
Excellent post Martin. I agree 110%.
From: "Martin Sansom" <martinsansom at hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 2:38 PM
To: <tig at colorist.org>
Subject: [Tig] Premature Death of SR
> Sohonet http://www.sohonet.co.uk sponsors the TIG.
> Digital Vision is patron of the TIG.
> Marquise Technologies supports the TIG.
> Colorist Directory at http://tig.colorist.org/wiki/Category:Colorist
> Interesting discussion but in my opinion the aesthetic appreciation of the
> images we deal with has been overlooked.There has been a magnificent irony
> in the last thirty years since I started as a colourist, there was a time
> when engineers, telecine operators, online editors et al would work long
> hours into the night extracting fractions of a percentage of performance
> improvement out of analog components in order to get the best out of the
> film that the image had been acquired from and the CRT domestic television
> that the viewer watched at home, it was the creed to constantly raise the
> bar in terms of image quality because the acquisition and distribution
> devices were capable of displaying more than the post production devices
> could process. That's all changed now, it's flat screen compressed digital
> hell, the viewer watches TV on a device that comes nowhere near the look
> of a CRT television and now with digital acquisition colourists spend more
> time faking the film look ( more artificial grain anyone? ) just as well
> we have these fancy do everything colour correctors, i need all those
> windows and plug ins in order to con the viewer (and the client) into
> believing that the image they're watching has more dynamic range that it
> actually has, rarely do I finesse a look from film anymore, instead I have
> to drag it kicking and screaming from a camcorder on steroids.
> Television audiences, the final arbiters of our work, have dumbed down
> their expectations of us and what we do, apparently they would rather have
> a thousand channels of artifact laden digital mush than sumptuous high
> quality imagery, and we, the purveyors of those images have likewise done
> the same, apparently for the same reason, we've always been under the
> thumb of the bean counters but the ongoing argument on here shows in my
> opinion that the accountants have hijacked my gamma curve and I can't
> afford the ransom.
> Martin "might as well grade it on a Kindle" Sansom.
> Colourist at large.
More information about the Tig