[Tig] Alexa. Lut or no Lut

Janet Falcon janet at shootersinc.com
Fri Feb 17 21:32:15 GMT 2012


So when everyone is talking about using LUTs in grading for tv and limiting the range, I assume the LUT is being put on in the input?  Does anyone use LUTs in the output?  That way the range is not limited as you are correcting "under" the LUT. Any reason not to work this way?
-Janet


On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:07 PM, "George Daniel Mitre" <danmitre at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Sohonet http://www.sohonet.co.uk sponsors the TIG.
> Support from Nucoda www.imagesystems.tv
> Support from Blackmagic Design http://www.blackmagic-design.com/
> ====
> 
> Plus what's the point to load a LUT when grading for TV when all it does is minimize your range?
> Yes I load, check, play, experiment, but never use it when grading for TV.
> 
> On Feb 17, 2012, at 11:40 PM, Carl Skaff wrote:
> 
>> Sohonet http://www.sohonet.co.uk sponsors the TIG.
>> Support from Nucoda www.imagesystems.tv
>> Support from Blackmagic Design http://www.blackmagic-design.com/
>> ====
>> 
>> When you guys grade Alexa LogC (from Prores)... Do you prefer to load a Lut
>> or not?
>> 
>> This is for grading for TV.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> And for you filmguys...
>> Anyone using a LogC>Linear Lut and the applying your own in-house-created
>> Luts?
>> 
>> I suppose that for an IIF ACES-workflow we would need to load a LogC>Lin
>> Lut and then the IDT. Or?
>> 
>> Or is the LogC>Lin mainly for VFX
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> /Carl
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> (Sent from mobile device)
>> ____________________________
>> *Carl Skaff*
>> *Colorist*
>> Stopp Stockholm
>> Office +46 8 50 70 35 00
>> 
>> *Stockholm | Los Angeles | Linz*
>> www.stopp.se
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://reels.colorist.org
>> http://tig.colorist.org/wiki3
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://reels.colorist.org
> http://tig.colorist.org/wiki3



More information about the Tig mailing list