[Tig] New "Look" or not?
js at grsv.com
Thu May 10 05:26:04 BST 2012
Congratulations. You've certainly created a unique look that's gotten
people talking. ;)
Clearly there is a low con trend that has really taken off since the
introduction of Alexa and log-C, as Dan Moran pointed to in it's extreme
we're basically looking at straight up log, as in this spot.
I probably had some thoughts on the look of Girls that I've walked back
since looking at that spot. But I do find it interesting that some of the
web promo pieces for Girls seemed to have a bit more contrast than the
show. Was a different LUT used on the dailies for the pilot?
There is the additional wrench in the works that many consumer sets are
overly contrasty. Since most of us in this business have rather well
adjusted sets, I wonder if we're not experiencing these low-con looks
differently than the average consumer. Maybe to them this looks right, for
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Sam Daley <sdaley at technicolorpwny.com>wrote:
> Sohonet www.sohonet.co.uk sponsors the TIG.
> Support from Digital Vision www.digitalvision.tv
> Support from Blackmagic Design www.blackmagic-design.com
> Support from Dolby Laboratories www.dolby.com
> I am the colorist for Season 1 of Girls. Allow me to address some of the
> comments in this thread.
> The pilot was shot on RED, the series on Alexa. Final grading was
> performed on Lustre. One LUT was created during preproduction tests and
> used on-set as a reference. No LUTs were created on-set, so monitor
> calibration was not a factor in the look. Dailies were graded with the
> reference LUT and additional primary color correction. No one ever saw a
> LOG-C image in the edit room.
> Though never communicated to me explicitly, there was an implied intent to
> visually set Girls apart from other female-centric network shows. The low
> contrast look was intentional from the start and was approved by a team of
> seasoned producers. I work frequently with Girls' Season 1 DP, Jody Lee
> Lipes. Jody prefers natural looking images. For his past few projects, he
> has been underexposing in-camera to reduce contrast and shadow detail; this
> continued with Girls. Black levels averaged 5 IRE. Highlights rarely
> Is this look a trend? Perhaps. I have noticed it in commercials and other
> media. Instagram was mentioned in this thread but the show was in the can
> before Instagram gained popularity. On an independent film that I graded
> recently, the director insisted on a low contrast, normal saturated look.
> His defense was that in real life we don't see crushed blacks, clipped
> whites or saturated colors. He's right. But does that look translate to
> the screen? Clearly the answer is in the eye of the beholder.
> I understand why other entries in this thread did not approve of this
> look. I tend to follow zone system principles so the low contrast look is
> counterintuitive to my work aesthetic. But I enjoy being challenged by my
> clients and helping them achieve their unique vision. It makes my job less
> "flat and dull". ;-)
> Sam Daley
More information about the Tig