[Tig] Remote Grading
David HJ. Lindberg
david.hj.lindberg at gmail.com
Wed Mar 6 12:59:43 GMT 2013
Thanks for the tips!
I'll look into those options although they may be a bit too expensive for
my current situation.
I think that Skype works pretty fine if you just want to show them before
and after, before putting them on render, although the resolution is far
from optimal which of course doesn't help the image from looking
interesting and good. But apparently that's the cheapest alternative on the
market right now.
2013/3/5 Jean-Francois Panisset <panisset at gmail.com>
> Sohonet www.sohonet.co.uk sponsors the TIG.
> Support from Digital Vision www.digitalvision.tv
> I suspect this is probably a lot more expensive than what you are
> looking for, but the TVIPS products such as the TVG-430, 450 or 480
> are good solutions for remote grading:
> (hmm, looks like the company is now called Nevion). Basically this is
> a box that takes HD-SDI on input and outputs JPEG 2000 over Ethernet,
> and on the other side the same box takes JPEG 2000 over Ethernet and
> spits out HD-SDI video. A lot of video over IP products are 8 bit only
> and only support 50/60 FPS broadcast frame rates: the TVG 430 supports
> 23.98/24 frame rates, and keeps 10 bits per color component. Also,
> since the JPEG 2000 codec is intra-frame only, the latency is low,
> which is great when the remote client is asking for adjustments and
> expects to see the picture change in more or less "real time".
> The downside is that this is a fairly bandwidth hungry solution, you
> want something like 50 to 60 mbit/sec to get a "visually lossless"
> picture. And it is certainly not inexpensive, it only makes sense if
> you are setting up a link that will be used quite often.
> A much less expensive solution is the Marshall line of H.264 video codecs:
> The VS-102-HDSDI will take HD-SDI input and output H.264 over
> Ethernet, and the VS-102-HDI on the receiving end can decode the H.264
> and output it via HDMI to a monitor. This product (and there are
> several similar ones) requires a lot less bandwidth, you can get a
> fairly decent H.264 stream at somewhere between 5 and 7 mbit/sec, but
> the latency is a lot higher, so that can be an issue if clients are
> expecting interactive performance at the remote site.
> JF Panisset
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:43 PM, David HJ. Lindberg
> <david.hj.lindberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm about to grade a commercial for clients in NYC and I'm curious about
> > what softwares you think is best for letting them see the grading live.
> > doesn't have to be realtime of course, but preferably it should be able
> > share the screen in at least 1080p.
> > Do you have any tips on other applications that is safe from color
> > and that delivers a good framerate as well as resolution?
David HJ. Lindberg
My films: http://vimeo.com/davidhjlindberg
My blog: http://davidhjlindberg.blogspot.com/
More information about the Tig